Kramah Software
Accreditation Management Services, AI enabled Customized Software for your Institution
Criterion 1: Outcome-Based Curriculum
2015: Focused on Vision, Mission, and Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) with a weightage of 50 marks.
2025: Emphasizes the integration of outcome-based education into the curriculum. New sub-criteria include strategies for education reforms, with a total weightage of 120 marks.
Criterion 2: Outcome-Based Teaching-Learning
2015: Primarily focused on teaching-learning processes with an emphasis on faculty delivery and course attainment.
2025: Shifts focus to practical student engagement, including capstone projects, internships, seminars, and self-learning through MOOCs.
Criterion 3: Outcome-Based Assessment
2015: Emphasized attainment calculations and quality assurance in assessments.
2025: Reduces the emphasis on attainment calculations and increases focus on the quality and output of assessments.
Criterion 4: Students’ Performance
2015: Evaluated through multiple sub-criteria, including the success rate of students with backlogs.
2025: Streamlines evaluation by focusing on overall program completion rates and participation in professional activities.
Criterion 5: Faculty Information
2015: Combined faculty information and contributions under a single criterion.
2025: Separates faculty information and contributions into two distinct criteria, with emphasis on qualifications and contributions.
Criterion 6: Faculty Contributions
2015: Assessed primarily through research publications and development activities.
2025: Expands to include industry training, collaborations, internships, and sponsored projects.
Criterion 7: Facilities and Technical Support
2015: Focused on availability and maintenance.
2025: Emphasizes quality, safety, and research-enhancing features including centers of excellence.
Criterion 8: Continuous Improvement
2015: Emphasized policy and documentation.
2025: Requires measurable iterative improvements across curriculum, teaching, and student outcomes.
Criterion 9: Student Support and Governance
2015: Treated support and governance separately.
2025: Combines them with a focus on holistic development, SDGs, and e-governance.
Conclusion
The NBA SAR 2025 format is a progressive leap toward global academic standards. With its student-centric, outcome-driven, and quality-focused approach, it not only ensures institutional accountability but also aligns with India’s vision for excellence in higher education.
Is your institution ready to transition to the NBA SAR 2025 format?
✅ Need Help with NBA Accreditation?
Kramah Software offers AI-powered accreditation solutions tailored for NBA 2025.
👉 Book a Demo Now to see how we simplify compliance and reporting.
What is the main difference between NBA SAR 2015 and 2025 formats?
The main difference lies in the emphasis on outcome-based education. NBA SAR 2025 introduces a more structured, student-centric approach with detailed criteria on curriculum reforms, assessments, and holistic development.
Why has the NBA introduced a new SAR format in 2025?
The 2025 format aligns with global accreditation standards and India’s NEP 2020 goals. It ensures institutions focus on practical skills, industry relevance, and measurable outcomes.
Has the weightage of criteria changed in NBA SAR 2025?
Yes, certain criteria now carry higher weightage. For example, Criterion 1 (Curriculum) increased from 50 to 120 marks, reflecting the importance of educational strategy and OBE integration.
Are faculty qualifications and contributions treated differently in 2025?
Yes. Unlike 2015, the 2025 format separates faculty qualifications and contributions into two criteria, allowing better evaluation of individual and institutional academic strength.
How can institutions prepare for the NBA SAR 2025 format?
Institutions should adopt accreditation management software, encourage faculty development, focus on student engagement activities, and ensure data-driven decision-making for continuous improvement.